Skip to content
Rapid Response

      Desks

      This library

      Emergency Orders

      How Long a Declaration Lasts

      Durations range from twenty-eight days to six months, and the renewal rule matters more than the number. Some statutes let the executive renew alone, one requires both houses to approve an extension, and the federal framework ends a declaration on its anniversary unless a notice is published.

      Emergency Orders6 min readState lawDuration and termination

      A large white notice board with bold blue lettering fixed behind a chain-link fence at a bare dirt lot
      The number of days is the easy part; who is allowed to add more of them is the difficult one. — Tony Webster from Cupertino, California, CC BY 2.0, source.

      The rule in short

      State emergency declarations carry statutory expiry dates that differ widely. Michigan sets twenty-eight days and requires a resolution of both houses to extend. Florida sets sixty days renewable by the governor. New York sets six months with additional six-month extensions by further order. The federal framework has no fixed term but terminates a national emergency on its anniversary unless the President publishes a continuation notice within the preceding ninety days.

      Every emergency statute answers two questions about time, and the second matters more than the first. The first is how long a declaration runs before it lapses. The second is who may extend it. A short period that the executive can renew without anyone else is functionally longer than a longer period that requires another branch to agree, and the statutes are drafted across that whole range.

      Twenty-eight days to six months

      Michigan is at the short end. A declared state of disaster continues until the governor finds the threat has passed, the disaster has been dealt with so that disaster conditions no longer exist, or the declaration has been in effect for twenty-eight days. After twenty-eight days the governor must issue an order or proclamation declaring the state of disaster terminated, unless a request by the governor for an extension for a specific number of days is approved by resolution of both houses of the legislature. The same structure and the same period apply to a declared state of emergency.

      Florida sits in the middle. No state of emergency may continue for longer than sixty days unless renewed by the Governor, and the statute applies a parallel sixty-day cap to the orders, proclamations and rules issued under the declaration, which may be renewed as necessary during the emergency provided that a renewal specifically states which provisions are being renewed.

      New York is at the long end. The executive order declaring a disaster emergency remains in effect for a period not exceeding six months or until rescinded by the governor, whichever occurs first, and the governor may issue additional orders extending the state disaster emergency for additional periods not to exceed six months. Alongside that sits a much shorter clock for suspensions: no suspension of a statute, local law, ordinance, order, rule or regulation may be made for a period in excess of thirty days, though on reconsideration of all the relevant facts and circumstances the governor may extend a suspension for additional periods of up to thirty days each.

      The renewal power is the real variable

      Reading the three side by side shows how little the headline number tells. Michigan's twenty-eight days cannot be extended by the executive at all; the extension is a legislative act, and the governor must terminate if it is not forthcoming. Florida's sixty days may be renewed by the Governor, so the practical limit is the willingness to keep signing. New York's six months may be extended by further executive orders in six-month blocks, again without any other actor.

      That difference determines where a dispute about duration goes. In a state where extension requires legislative approval, the constitutional argument arises only if the executive re-declares rather than seeking approval. In a state where the executive may renew alone, the argument is instead about whether an indefinite series of renewals is what the legislature authorized, and about whether the legislature retains a termination power of its own, which is the subject of ending a declaration over the executive's objection.

      The terminating conditions written into the declaration itself supply a third reference point. Michigan and Florida both require the order to state the conditions permitting termination, and the Michigan statute independently obliges the governor to end the declaration once the threat has passed or the disaster has been dealt with so that disaster conditions no longer exist. Read together, those provisions mean expiry is not the only endpoint: an emergency is meant to end when the recited conditions are satisfied, whether or not the statutory period has run.

      JurisdictionInitial periodWho may extendExtension length
      MichiganTwenty-eight daysBoth houses of the legislature by resolutionA specific number of days requested
      Florida, general emergencySixty daysThe GovernorRenewal as necessary during the emergency
      Florida, public health emergencySixty daysState Health Officer with the Governor's concurrenceRenewal on concurrence
      New York, declarationSix monthsThe governor by further orderAdditional periods up to six months
      New York, suspension of a lawThirty daysThe governor on reconsiderationAdditional periods up to thirty days
      National emergencyNo fixed termContinues by published noticeEnds on the anniversary absent notice

      The anniversary rule

      The federal framework takes a different approach: instead of a term, it uses a lapse. Any national emergency declared under the framework and not otherwise previously terminated terminates on the anniversary of the declaration if, within the ninety-day period before each anniversary, the President does not publish in the Federal Register and transmit to Congress a notice stating that the emergency is to continue in effect after that anniversary.

      The mechanism is an affirmative act requirement rather than a limit. A declaration continues indefinitely so long as the notice is published each year, and it ends automatically if it is not. Termination may also come from a proclamation by the President or from an enacted joint resolution, whichever specified date is earlier.

      Termination does not unwind what was done. Powers exercised by reason of the emergency cease to be exercised after the specified date, except that termination does not affect any action taken or proceeding pending and not finally concluded on that date, or any action or proceeding based on an act committed before it.

      Alongside the anniversary rule sits a review obligation directed at the legislature rather than the executive. Not later than six months after a national emergency is declared, and not later than the end of each six-month period thereafter while it continues, each House of Congress is to meet to consider a vote on a joint resolution determining whether the emergency should be terminated. The duty is to meet and consider rather than to act, so a declaration can persist through many such intervals without any vote changing it.

      Two clocks, and a component can expire first

      The declaration and the orders under it may run on different schedules. Florida caps both at sixty days and requires a renewal to state which provisions are being renewed, which means a renewal that omits a provision lets it lapse. New York caps suspensions at thirty days inside a six-month declaration. An affected party checking only whether the emergency is still declared will not know whether the specific order affecting them is still in force.

      The separate public health track

      Public health emergencies frequently have their own declaring officer and their own duration. Florida places responsibility for declaring a public health emergency on the State Health Officer and provides that such a declaration lasts sixty days unless the Governor concurs in its renewal. The powers activated are health-specific, including the order of isolation or quarantine, and the concurrence requirement inserts a second official into every extension.

      Where a general emergency and a public health emergency are declared over the same events, they run in parallel with separate expiry dates, separate renewal mechanics and separate sets of activated powers. A statute activated by one is not activated by the other, and the distinction matters for provisions keyed to a specific declaration, such as the pricing restrictions described in price gouging statutes activated by a declaration. The declaration mechanics themselves are set out in declaring an emergency and what it unlocks.

      Points to carry away

      • Michigan limits a declared state of disaster or emergency to twenty-eight days.
      • Extending the Michigan period requires approval by resolution of both houses of the legislature.
      • Florida limits a state of emergency to sixty days unless renewed by the governor.
      • New York orders last no more than six months, extendable by further orders of up to six months each.
      • A national emergency terminates on its anniversary unless a continuation notice is published within the preceding ninety days.
      • A Florida public health emergency runs sixty days unless the governor concurs in a renewal.

      Questions readers ask

      Does an expired declaration undo what was done under it?

      Generally not. The federal framework addresses this expressly for national emergencies: on termination, powers exercised by reason of the emergency cease to be exercised after the specified date, but termination does not affect any action taken or proceeding pending and not finally concluded, or any action or proceeding based on an act committed before that date. The pattern in state law is similar. Expiry stops the exercise of authority going forward; it does not retroactively invalidate steps already taken.

      Can an executive declare a new emergency on the same facts?

      The statutes rarely forbid it, and the question is contested. Those challenging the practice argue that a fresh declaration on unchanged facts defeats a legislative limit and turns a fixed term into an indefinite one. Governments respond that conditions evolve, that each declaration rests on its own findings, and that nothing in the statutes limits the number of declarations. Where a statute conditions extension on legislative approval, the argument is sharper, because a re-declaration reaches a result the extension provision withheld.

      Do the underlying orders expire with the declaration?

      Usually, because they are conditioned on it. Emergency orders and suspensions are typically authorized only during a declared emergency, so the lapse of the declaration removes their footing. Some statutes set independent limits on the components: New York caps a suspension of a statute at thirty days, renewable in further thirty-day periods, which means a suspension can expire while the declaration continues. Reading the declaration alone will not tell an affected party when a particular order stops operating.

      Sources

      1. Michigan Compiled Laws section 30.403Limits a state of disaster or emergency to twenty-eight days and requires a resolution of both houses to extend.
      2. Florida Statutes section 252.36Limits a state of emergency to sixty days unless renewed by the Governor, and caps emergency orders at sixty days.
      3. New York Executive Law section 28Sets a six-month maximum with additional orders extending the emergency for further periods of up to six months.
      4. New York Executive Law section 29-aCaps any suspension of a statute or rule at thirty days, extendable in further thirty-day periods on reconsideration.
      5. 50 U.S.C. 1622 — National emergenciesTerminates a national emergency on its anniversary absent a published continuation notice, and preserves pending actions.
      6. Florida Statutes section 381.00315Limits a declared public health emergency to sixty days unless the Governor concurs in a renewal.

      Rapid Response Law is a publication, not a law firm. This article states general rules and cites its sources; it is not advice about any particular case, and the law differs by state and changes over time.

      More in Emergency Orders

      Emergency Orders

      Challenging an Order While the Emergency Continues

      A challenge to an operative emergency order begins with an application for interim relief. An order granting, continuing, modifying, refusing or dissolving an injunction is immediately appealable, so a ruling either way can be taken up at once. A party seeking a stay ordinarily moves first in the district court. Governments argue for deference on a thin record; challengers argue that urgency does not lower the standard of justification.

      6 min readFederal and state

      Emergency Orders

      Quarantine and Isolation Orders and the Process Owed

      Federal authority to apprehend, examine, quarantine or isolate an individual rests on regulations under the Public Health Service Act and applies to diseases specified by executive order. An order requires a finding that the individual is reasonably believed to be infected with a quarantinable disease in a qualifying stage and is moving or about to move between states, or is a probable source of infection to such persons. Reassessment by a different official follows within seventy-two hours.

      6 min readState law

      Emergency Orders

      When an Expired Order Can Still Be Reviewed

      The judicial power extends to cases and controversies, so a challenge to an order that no longer operates ordinarily ends. Two exceptions matter here. The first covers disputes capable of repetition yet evading review, which requires that the challenged action be too short in duration to be fully litigated and that there be a reasonable expectation the same party will face it again. The second addresses voluntary cessation by the party whose conduct is challenged.

      6 min readFederal law