The full library in alphabetical order, across every area of law.
A preservation letter is a private demand, not process. It cannot order anyone to do anything, and a court will not sanction a recipient merely for ignoring one. What it does is establish notice: after a specific letter describing a dispute, a recipient cannot credibly say litigation was unforeseeable. Specificity is what gives the letter effect, and an unreasonably broad demand tends to weaken rather than strengthen the sender's position.
A public adjuster is licensed to prepare and negotiate a first-party claim on behalf of the insured for compensation. Florida caps the fee at ten percent for claims made in the year after a declared state of emergency and twenty percent otherwise, with a separate ceiling for reopened and supplemental claims, and requires a written contract with cancellation rights and a written estimate within sixty days. California requires a contract on a commissioner-approved form.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c) permits a court to issue a preliminary injunction or restraining order only if the movant gives security in an amount the court considers proper to pay the costs and damages sustained by any party found to have been wrongfully enjoined. The United States, its officers and its agencies are exempt by rule and by statute. Courts of appeals differ on whether a district court may dispense with security entirely or must set at least a nominal sum.
Section 362(c)(3) provides that where an individual debtor had a case pending within the preceding year that was dismissed, the stay terminates on the thirtieth day after the later filing with respect to the debtor. Section 362(c)(4) provides that where two or more such cases were dismissed, no stay goes into effect at all. In each situation a party in interest may move to continue or impose the stay, and must demonstrate that the later filing is in good faith.
A stay pending review is governed by four factors: likelihood of success on the merits, irreparable injury without a stay, injury to the opposing party if one issues, and the public interest. The first two are the most heavily weighted, and a bare possibility of harm does not satisfy the second. The statutory clear-and-convincing standard governs injunctions against removal, not stays, and conflating the two overstates what an applicant must prove.
Notice must be given at least sixty calendar days before a planned closing or mass layoff. Where separations occur on different days, the first individual termination within the statutory thirty-day or ninety-day period triggers the requirement, and each subsequent group of terminees is entitled to a full sixty days. A notice may express the date as a specific day or as a fourteen-day period, in which case the sixty days run from the first day of that period.
A covered entity must notify each affected individual without unreasonable delay and in no case later than sixty calendar days after discovery of a breach of unsecured protected health information. Discovery is defined by knowledge attributed across the workforce, not by the moment senior management is briefed. Breaches touching five hundred or more individuals require contemporaneous notice to the Secretary and notice to prominent media; smaller ones are logged and reported annually.
State notification statutes fall into two families. One family sets an outer limit in days, counted either from discovery of the breach or from the determination that a breach occurred. The other family requires notice in the most expedient time possible and without unreasonable delay, with no number at all. Several states in the first family have moved to thirty days, others sit at forty-five or sixty, and the counting event differs even among statutes that share a number.
The standard fire policy conditions require the insured to render a signed and sworn proof of loss within sixty days of the loss unless the insurer extends the time in writing, stating the time and origin of the loss, the interests of all parties, the value of each item and other insurance. Regulators require insurers to supply the forms and instructions, and bar denial merely because the proof was not on the insurer's usual form.
A temporary restraining order issued without notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b) expires at a time the court sets, not to exceed fourteen days after entry. The court may extend it once for a like period on a stated finding of good cause, or for longer if the restrained party consents. The motion for a preliminary injunction must be set for hearing at the earliest possible time, and the party that obtained the order must proceed at that hearing or lose it.
A petition for review must be filed not later than thirty days after the date of the final order of removal, in the court of appeals for the judicial circuit in which the immigration judge completed proceedings. Filing a motion to reopen or reconsider does not extend the period, and the petition does not by itself suspend removal. A separate stay application is required, and the two filings serve different purposes.
The statute allows a shortened notice period in three situations. The faltering company exception applies only to plant closings and requires four conditions to be met together. The unforeseeable business circumstances exception turns on a sudden, dramatic and unexpected condition outside the employer's control, tested against commercially reasonable judgment. The natural disaster exception requires the action to be a direct result of the disaster. The employer bears the burden throughout.
